Mmm what about newer Sigma 18-200 and 18-250 with IS built-in? Those are maybe better ?
2010/9/3 Adam Maas <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:46 AM, eckinator <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> just checked, I can have my 18-250 repaired for EUR 122,57 or replace >> it with an Tamron or Sigma 18-200 for 160 - which would you do? Also >> can anyone comment on IQ differences if there are any? >> >> TIA Ecke > > Neither the Tamron nor the Sigma 18-200's are worth bothering with. If > you're going to replace the Pentax 18-250, get the Tamron 18-250, it's > the same lens. > > -Adam > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
