The Nikon is quite good, it's actually better than the Nikon 35/2 AF-D (a fact that annoy FX shooters to no end since the 35/.8 is DX-only) the Sony won't ship for another couple weeks.
-Adam On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Thibouille <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed on marketing PoV. But how are those optically? I read quite > soft wide open but didn't see any serious test (no DPR lens tests are > no serious to me). > > The DA35 seems to be VERY close to FA35 at least looking at the > optical blueprint. > It may be 2.4 but it also may be VERY good optically. I know what I'd > buy if I had choice (but we all know we do not). > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs > ---------------------- > Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, > DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... > Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 > Programing: Delphi 2009 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
