Sure David, but that's just a slightly different circumstance than what we're discussing here I think.
On that note, it's too bad more folks don't shoot for the square. A guy I follow on flickr regularly shoots squares and they are some of my fav images. Possibly because they are so different from what we normally see. On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Parsons <[email protected]> wrote: > Tell that to people who shot with 6x6 cameras. It's impossible to > shoot with a square frame and not need to crop for standard > rectangular frames when printing. > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Walter Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In any event, your answer was what I suspected the case was. Cropping is >> cropping and is not a substitute for compositional framing. I'll never be a >> Cartier-Bresson, obviously. But, so far as I know, not many are. :-) >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Walt > > > -- > David Parsons Photography > http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com > > Aloha Photographer Photoblog > http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- ~Nick David Wright http://www.nickdavidwright.net/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
