I crop many of my shots. Leaving some room for sizing can be a good thing. Cropping is a benefit of higher resolution. On the other hand, seeing the final result when you frame the photo is essential to good photography. But a bit of looseness is not necessarily a negative. Paul On Oct 25, 2010, at 6:23 PM, David Parsons wrote:
> Tell that to people who shot with 6x6 cameras. It's impossible to > shoot with a square frame and not need to crop for standard > rectangular frames when printing. > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:24 AM, Walter Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In any event, your answer was what I suspected the case was. Cropping is >> cropping and is not a substitute for compositional framing. I'll never be a >> Cartier-Bresson, obviously. But, so far as I know, not many are. :-) >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Walt > > > -- > David Parsons Photography > http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com > > Aloha Photographer Photoblog > http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
