Boris Liberman wrote:
In brief, I am finding that quite many people are hmmm well, let me put it
this way - gear oriented too much, so that they would buy and encourage
others to buy a new piece of gear even if reality does not require that.
Very clear now, and I quite agree. However, I find this list much more
easygoing now and less gear-oriented than it used to be.
About me, I'm usually interested in knowing how new gear performs, while I
don't die behind it when I don't think it won't help me significantly.
However, other folks cound be interested in specs I find useless or
counterproductive (e.g. 100% FOV), so why not let them know? Given the kind
of photography I do, any improvement in high-ISO performance (and AF too) is
paramount, while I stay cold with most other specs. That's the reason
because I gladly skipped the K-7, while I gladly skipped the K-7
P.S. Did you think of Co*tty* but were so*rr*y thereby producing a new
word of English language? :-) I marked the relevant word by slashes
(italics)...
;-) Sorry, just a typo!
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
