On Nov 6, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Miserere wrote:
On 6 November 2010 16:47, Jaume Lahuerta <[email protected]> wrote:
This fortunate Spanish K-5 owner tried to recover a picture where
the flash
didn't fire when it was supposed to do (it wasn't charged).
They challenged the camera for fun and were surprised by the
results:
http://www.pentaxeros.com/forum/index.php?topic=37916.0
¡Coño!
:-o
But for the record, DxO Mark is still worthless.
Here's an interesting piece that seems to say the same thing, albeit
more diplomatically :)
http://falklumo.blogspot.com/2009/12/lumolabs-sensors-of-nikon-d700-d5000.html
This guy seems to know what he's talking about.
He does appear knowledgeable, although his analysis is obfuscated to
the point where it's difficult to judge the accuracy of his
conclusions. In any case, they seem to be more or less in line with
DxO.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
