Of course, there is that piece of data that is a supposed 10 stop
underexposure save of an image.  Graphs are are nice but that image is
impressive if its true.

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Miserere <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 6 November 2010 22:11, paul stenquist <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On re-reading his post, I come away with the feeling that the confusion I 
>> feel is more the result of clumsy rhetoric rather than technical complexity. 
>> His message is hidden behind misplaced modifiers and contorted sentence 
>> structure.
>> Paul
>
> He's German. I've read engineering geekspeak from native English
> speakers that was hard to understand--Falk is simply more efficient at
> making it hard to understand  :-)
>
> But he does know what he's talking about. I usually read his articles
> a couple of times before *I* know what he's talking about.
>
>
>  --M.
> --
>
>     \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
>
>     http://EnticingTheLight.com
>     A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
Steve Desjardins

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to