P N Stenquist wrote: >On Nov 6, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > >> Miserere wrote: >> >>> But for the record, DxO Mark is still worthless. >> >> Here's an interesting piece that seems to say the same thing, albeit >> more diplomatically :) >> http://falklumo.blogspot.com/2009/12/lumolabs-sensors-of-nikon-d700-d5000.html >> This guy seems to know what he's talking about. >> >He does appear knowledgeable, although his analysis is obfuscated to >the point where it's difficult to judge the accuracy of his >conclusions.
Obfuscated is the opposite of what his explanations are! What I particularly like is how he's completely open about his measurement process so that anyone could, potentially, duplicate it and corroborate his findings. The comments and his answers are particularly illuminating - pun intended! And I liked how he slapped down the first "anonymous :) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
