You're right, it's extremely misleading! I hate to be cynical, but from this guy's description, he seems to know something about photography. Otherwise, he wouldn't know that a 1.2 is extremely fast. It's not like he's playing dumb - you know, like "I know nothing about cameras, I'm selling this for an ailing friend who's blind and can't use his equipment anymore", sort of thing.
I'd say this borders on fraud. Reminds me of those auctions that mention only the word "Pentax" in the title and description, and when you look closely at the fuzzy pictures, you barely make out the word "Albinar", or some such. Pretty sleazy! regards, frank "Juan J. Buhler" wrote: > http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1331704425 > > For $75, I was jumping at it until I noticed that the pictures are of a 50/2 > lens. Talk about misleading descriptions. > > And I find this just a few hours after having the chance of looking at Shel's > A50/1.2. It's amazing how much brighter than a 1.4 it makes the viewfinder. > > Sheesh. > > j > > ===== > -- > Juan J. Buhler > http://www.jbuhler.com > Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! > http://greetings.yahoo.com > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
