True, he has changed the description, but the price? The subject title above is still correct.
Malcolm > The problem is that Saturday morning it was described as a 1.2 in > both the title and > in the description. I ~think~ it was also mentioned in the > description that it is > an extremely fast lens - but hey, it was 6:00 Saturday morning, > and I was still only > on my first cup. > > But when you waited for the fuzzy pictures to load, on one of > them you could clearly > see it was a 2.0. > > I thought he was trying to scam folks, he has obviously noticed > the error and > changed it. I think any errors can be rectified as long as a bid > hasn't been made. > > No way a 2.0's worth $75, but at least it's not misleading... > > regards, > frank - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
