On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:54 -0600, "Jeffery Smith"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The 16-50 is about $750 in the US. You are down under?


Tan is.

The interesting thing about prices down under is that, although the $A
has been approaching or at parity with the $US in recent months, lens
prices have remained high in comparison with those in the US.  It's a
much smaller market, of course.  The prices Tan quoted are about right
for one of the more reputable on-line sellers here.  They would probably
be even higher at the usual High Street shops.



Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/

> 
> 
> On Nov 23, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for all of the feedback guys.  Yep, I know that the AOV is quite
> > varied in this grouping - I am more interested really in the widest end, and
> > the speed (and of course overall image quality etc).  I'm really thinking
> > that at f4 the 12-24 is just that bit too slow. I know that it is a lovely
> > lens and I considered it a while back but f4, with moving babies and darkish
> > interiors.  Of course, when I get my hands on my new K-5, it won't be such
> > an  issue...
> > 
> > I do know also that the 16-50, isn't too much different from the 18-55 kit
> > lens that I currently have, but you know I NEVER use it unless it is for an
> > interior or a funky looking fashion shot and it is almost ALMOST used at
> > 18mm.  I'd love something a little wider, but not to the point of being fish
> > eye, which is why I included the 16-50.  I don't EVER use zooms anymore
> > unless I really have to.  I shoot almost exclusively these days with my
> > FA50mm 1.7 or my FA100m f2.8 macro and very occasionally with the 18-55mm or
> > I also have a 28-70mm/f2.8 Tokina that is getting on now but is a huge,
> > heavy lens and gives fine results and used to be my main lens in my wedding
> > photography days...
> > 
> > Anyways, I think I pretty much have it narrowed down to either the:
> > 
> > 2. PENTAX-DA*  16-50mm f/2.8 ED AL[IF]SDM - about $1400 
> > Or
> > 4. Sigma Lens 10-20mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM       - about $927
> > 
> > I just think that the 12-24mm is just that bit too slow.
> > 
> > Interested to hear any further thoughts?
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> > follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> 
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
                          love email again


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to