I agree, I was told the voting is allowed to continue because the "team" just 
can't keep up.(??) I guess my basic wonderment is why allow voting beyond 60 
when there are live (new) images in the queue awaiting voters. More votes being 
a better quality assessment notwithstanding.
I offered my appreciation for the PPG. It is a stimulant that is absolutely 
basic to the nature of the photo enthusiasts. Exposure, judgment and approval 
are sought to validate an emotional investment. 

Jack

--- On Wed, 12/22/10, AlunFoto <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: AlunFoto <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: PPG VOTING
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Wednesday, December 22, 2010, 4:39 AM
> 2010/12/22 Jack Davis <[email protected]>:
> > Reads as though you must have read my last email to
> Pentax.;)
> > Seems to me that if the voting is allowed to continue,
> the 20%
> > criterion may be ultimately met even though the image
> was allegedly
> > toast at 60 votes. Makes my head hurt.
> > My guess is that many have become bored with voting
> and those
> > who are may be spending time on dead horse
> images.(??)
> 
> Rest your head, Jack. :-)
> If a photo receives 12 nays before reaching 60 votes, it's
> automatically out. No beating of dead horses.
> If a photo receives 20% nays after reaching 60 votes, it's
> automatically out. Those horses will no longer be beaten
> either.
> 
> More votes (>60) does not work against any photo per se,
> it just means
> that the percentage is drawn from a larger sample of votes.
> So the
> surplus votes are not beating dead horses, but rather
> firming up the
> percentages for the keepers. Of course, an image could
> encounter a
> batch of nay-votes late in the process, making it tip the
> 20% balance.
> But the more votes, the more likely is that percentage to
> be
> representative for "general opinion". :-)
> 
> Anyway, it's the three weeks' turnover that is the real
> problem. My
> guess is that the gallery requires more human attention
> than Pentax
> anticipated.
> 
> Jostein
> 
> -- 
> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 


      

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to