On Dec 21, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > "I'm surprised anyone cares. Voting is a colossal waste of time." > > My political philosophy.
That too. Paul Feeling inordinately gruff, after a horrible 24-hour flu. > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:29 PM, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> > wrote: >> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >> >>> Reads as though you must have read my last email to Pentax.;) Seems to me >>> that if the voting is allowed to continue, the 20% criterion may be >>> ultimately met even though the image was allegedly toast at 60 votes. Makes >>> my head hurt. >>> My guess is that many have become bored with voting and those who are may >>> be spending time on dead horse images.(??) >>> >>> Jack >> >> I'm surprised anyone cares. Voting is a colossal waste of time. >> >>> >>> --- On Tue, 12/21/10, AlunFoto <alunf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From: AlunFoto <alunf...@gmail.com> >>>> Subject: Re: PPG VOTING >>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >>>> Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 3:47 PM >>>> 2010/12/21 Jack Davis <jdavi...@yahoo.com>: >>>>> >>>>> I so don't get this, but I'm told that due to time >>>> constraints, voting may go >>>>> on beyond the 60 to as many as 200. Couldn't get a >>>> clear answer as to why. >>>>> Why should the largly dead horse voting be allowed to >>>> continue, thus >>>>> detracting from surviving image voting and delaying >>>> the process? >>>> >>>> My understanding is that If it gets 12 nays out of 60, it >>>> is removed >>>> from the queue and flagged as rejected on the artist's >>>> page. If you >>>> get a fast rejection, it's because of getting 12 nays >>>> before reaching >>>> a total of 60 votes. >>>> >>>> What would be interesting to know is what happens as votes >>>> accumulate >>>> beyond 60. 12 out of 60 is 20%. Does that mean that if ever >>>> a photo >>>> tops 20% nays, it's out? That seems logical to me. >>>> >>>> I assume votes can accumulate until presented to the Pentax >>>> team. So >>>> time constraints could very well be a way to say that the >>>> team don't >>>> have time to meet frequently enough to do away with the >>>> queue at 60 >>>> votes. >>>> >>>> Jostein >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ >>>> http://alunfoto.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >>>> directly above and follow the directions. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
