Perhaps I will spend some time voting again. I haven't voted or submitted in at 
least a couple years. But it's been a busy time for me.
Paul


On Dec 23, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:

> I for one, find voting in PPG to be rather pleasant past time for me. 
> Although there are some truly awful images in there, most are not and the 
> fact that the next page can hold something completely unexpected is nice.
> 
> Presently I am trying to cross the mere barrier of 10 images in my PPG set. 
> Probably should submit more as it is somewhat intriguing.
> 
> The likes of you Jostein and Bong with triple digit figures of accepted 
> pictures is pretty mind blowing for me.
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> On 12/22/2010 7:14 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
>> 2010/12/22 Daniel J. Matyola<[email protected]>:
>>> It seems to have worked for me, as I now have fewer rejects and more
>>> accepted images, and my Pentax Gallery is up to 46.   That certainly
>>> doesn't mean that I am a better photographer, just that I can predict
>>> better what might get accepted.  Also, when someone sees one of my
>>> images and asks to see more, I can give them the link to my Pentax
>>> Gallery, knowing that the images there probably appeal to a wide
>>> variety of tastes, and not just my idiosyncratic  photographic vision.
>> 
>> Well said, Dan!
>> 
>> I also find it interesting to then present the same images to a
>> totally different group of photographers. It's amazing how much
>> groupthink there is in viewing photographs. :-)
>> 
>> Jostein
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to