Paul wrote:
>thanks for the info, i was actualy after info on A series 120/4 macro. Is >this optically the same as the FA? except for the lack of AF of course. Ooops...BTW Jostein did a shootout with the A645 120/4 Macro on a K-mount slr and compared it to one of the common Pentax 135mm K-mount lenses; either the 135/2.8, 2,5 or 3.5 - I don't remember. The result was not that good; the K-mount lenses were clearly better. However, as I said in a previous post, my FA645 120/4 macro is actually better, or equally good (at similar apertures), as the great A* 135/1.8. This may indicate that the FA 120 is significantly better than the A 120. P�l - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
