"I know that buying one now is a mistake, but is it a good mistake or a bad mistake? "
Sorry I can't help, Larry, having a K7, but this deserves a "Mark!" On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > The K-5 looks like it might be the camera that I've been waiting for for > three years. > > I'm seriously considering an act of extreme fiscal irresponsibility in the > next week, but need to do some due diligence first. I know that buying one > now is a mistake, but is it a good mistake or a bad mistake? Is there anyone > one this list with one that is having serious second thoughts about it? My > initial reaction to the K20 was that it was an improvement in almost every > way over my K100, though it took a while for me to make use of any > performance improvements and actually get better quality photos than with my > K100. With my K-x, on the other hand, where the performance was improved, > the differences were immediately obvious. Though I 'm still not convinced > that it's better than the K20 below ISO 640. > > I do a lot of photography above ISO 1600. How does the K-5 compare with the > K-x? I.e. does 25,600 look about like 6400? > > How do the low ISOs compare with either the K20 or the K-x? For that matter, > how does any of the performance compare with these cameras? > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
