On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:57 PM, Tim Bray wrote: > OK, let me seize my chance to show my ignorance. Compared to a K-5 or > equivalent, the 645D is bigger, heavier, slower, and doesn't have as > many interesting lenses. Its only advantage is a mega-huge sensor > with correspondingly many pixels. So my conclusion was that this > kind of thing is really only useful for those who want to do > large-format printing, magazine pages and up. > > Is there any other reason to use one, aside from it being beautiful > and seductive and all that? -Tim
Bong posted some shots taken with one at relatively high ISO, that looked better than many cameras at ISO 400. I believe that it'll also handily outperform the K-5 on things like color bit depth, dynamic range etc. It also brightens your teeth, freshens your breath and makes you irresistible to members of the appropriate sex. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
