Now, if DxO _really_ found the 645D to attract members of the opposite sex, I bet they'd be reluctant to state it. So you won't know until you've owned one. :-)
Jostein 2011/1/13 Miserere <[email protected]>: > On 13 January 2011 01:02, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 12, 2011, at 9:57 PM, Tim Bray wrote: >> >>> Is there any other reason to use one, aside from it being beautiful >>> and seductive and all that? -Tim >> >> Bong posted some shots taken with one at relatively high ISO, that looked >> better than many cameras at ISO 400. I believe that it'll also handily >> outperform the K-5 on things like color bit depth, dynamic range etc. It >> also brightens your teeth, freshens your breath and makes you irresistible >> to members of the appropriate sex. > > Not quite according to DxO Mark: > > http://tinyurl.com/49ac7h5 > > The K-5 has 1.5 extra stops of dynamic range. > > The 645D does have a 1 stop advantage in S/N at each ISO, but given > their respective surface areas this advantage should be 2 stops, which > goes to show what a great sensor Sony made, or what a crappy sensor > Kodak made (only as far as high ISOs are concerned, I'm not saying > anything else). > > My response to Tim would be: Aside from that, no reason except > bragging rights or being Mark. > > > —M. > > \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com > > http://EnticingTheLight.com > A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
