On Mar 20, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote: > The combo seems to front focus a lot in the studio. In fluorescent it > is hit and miss. Improves in halogen light, but I can't really trust > it. It seem to do ok in daylight. I'm assuming that in house > AF-adjustments is not the way to go. That it will be useless outdoor > if I corrects it for indoor light. Am I right about this? > > FA* 85 is mostly spot on. So I'm blaming the DA* 16-50. > > What do you think guys? Should I use the situation as an excuse for an > enablement?
Whatever it takes. Every time that I though I found a way in which the K20 was better than the K-5, I eventually learned that I had not properly read the K-5 manual. > > My eyes are not up to critical manual focus indoor. Should I look for > another lens to use in the studio? Tamron 28-75/2,8 could be the lens > I need. Also musing at 35mm 2,8 Ltd, but I end up regretting not > buying a faster 35mm. I'm very intrigued by the 28-75 myself, it's a range that I find myself needing a lot. How sharp is it? My two zooms are the 18-250 and the 16-50, how would it compare with them? -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
