On 4/5/2011 11:06, Rob Studdert wrote:
Where this argument falls flat is that the vast majority of the
problems reported, ie wonky mirrors, sticky buttons, failing rotary
actuators, motors/gears/clutches in lenses, spots on sensors are all
generally of mechanical nature. None of these issues are involve
significantly more complex systems than Pentax used to be able to
execute so successfully prior to their foray into DSLR production.
Well, Rob, it is correct what you say but consider these points:
* K7 and consequently K5 offer both faster shutters and more silent
mirror mechanisms. Although falling under same mechanical category for
most part, these are new "features".
* I don't know what kind of complexity, especially with regard to
manufacturing mechanical tolerances, is introduced by 100% viewfinder.
* Pentax like everyone is still about reducing manufacturing costs... It
has to be factored in to the equation.
But I certainly agree that things such as buttons or control wheels all
should function 120% perfect.
Finally, sad as it is, and as dead as any other dead horse over here,
the fact that Pentax is no longer Pentax, but rather Hoya-Pentax has to
be considered as well.
Again, I am not offering excuses and quite sorry ones at that. I am
offering an explanation as to why this is all may be happening...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
