AlunFoto wrote:
Lovely bird portrait, Liz.
In my opinion, a shot like this taken in the wild is always ethically
dubious, in contrast to one shot under controlled conditions like you
have done. If shot in the wild, the burden of evidence is always on
the photographer to convince the audience that no harm came to the
animal. Including imprinting.
Throw that back to the purists and see how they handle it. :-)
Jostein
Glad you pointed that out, too -- I wholeheartedly agree.
ann
2011/4/7 Liz Masoner <lizmaso...@bellsouth.net>:
It's not a cormorant but I was happy to get a chance to photograph a baby
great horned owl at the local wildlife center today. He'll be with the
center until about August when he's old enough to fend for himself.
http://lizmasoner.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/i-love-the-shot/
~Liz
http://lizmasoner.wordpress.com/
http://thornsnclaws.wordpress.com/
http://photography.about.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
