My wife disagrees with you, your picture is better. The Canon shot is too over exposed in the foreground and looks like it has been over sharpened for a misty scene.The sepia tone doesn't help the Canon image, neither does the large expanses top and bottom of sepia toned featureless cloud and what looks like builder's rubble due to the sharpening.
Apart from that given the difference in focal ranges of the lenses used and the complete inappropriateness of the entire scene for comparing sharpness, I'd just enjoy using excellent equipment to photograph beautiful scenery - at present I'm trying to figure out how I can take a week off work and just drive out of the city with the only goal of stopping to photograph anything interesting/beautiful/ugly (in a pleasant way) that I happen to see. Leon On 14 April 2011 16:27, SV Hovland <[email protected]> wrote: > I posted a picture here a few weeks ago and a friend of me with a Canon EOS > 7D took a similar picture. > > You can download it here (it is 16MB!!) : > http://download.heime.org/sfk/IMG_7553%20bruntone%207.jpg Please note that > this is not a picture taken by me. > > My picture is here: http://album.heime.org/album/tur/imgp0038.jpg > > I think his photo is great and a lot better than mine, but I noticed how much > noise and something which looks like noise removal artifacts in it. It is > taken at ISO100. He has used a lot of sharpening, which is a possible > explanation. > > > Here is a 100% crop of both pictures. From K-5, ISO 80 at the top and from > EOS7D, ISO100 at the bottom. > http://album.heime.org/album/temporary/7d.jpg > > > Lenses used are DA18-135 and Sigma 8-16 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
