On Apr 14, 2011, at 7:19, Stan Halpin wrote: > On your main point, I don't see what you refer to as noise in his image.
Same here... > And returning to your main point, again I don't see what you are referring to > as noise in his image. I didn't find anything in focus, and there seems to be > some camera movement, but I don't see noise. > I had that problem as well. It's fuzzy and WAAAAY over-processed. Those are my main complaints with this image. My thoughts as I looked at it were: "what the hell was he THINKING?" >> >> You can download it here (it is 16MB!!) : >> http://download.heime.org/sfk/IMG_7553%20bruntone%207.jpg Please note that >> this is not a picture taken by me. >> >> My picture is here: http://album.heime.org/album/tur/imgp0038.jpg I prefer your image merely because it does not look nearly as "manipulated" as his. More detail, too. But I don't think it's the fault of his camera that his 15-meg (!!) image has less information than your. I think he cooked/worked/fiddled with it to its detriment. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
