On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:38 -0500, "Christine  Aguila"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> No, not really interested in that.  Cheers, Christine
> 


Well, I would be.  Or, at least I think I would be.

I've only briefly played with the original EP-1 and I liked it a lot.  I
might have a totally different opinion once I've looked at a mirrorless
camera seriously, though....



Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/




> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Steven Desjardins" <[email protected]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 6:56 PM
> Subject: Re: What next in an SLR?
> 
> 
> Mirrorless with K-5 sensor?
> 
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Christine  Aguila
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Not really sure if it would save money, but maybe it would--or not :-). 
> > I'd
> > want the weather sealing, Steve! Cheers, Christine
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Desjardins" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 6:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: What next in an SLR?
> >
> >
> > Would leaving any of that out really save any money? Isn't most of
> > that already on the chip or mostly firmware? Maybe a KX style plastic
> > body with no weather sealing.
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Christine Aguila
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> 1) Pentax still needs to improve on low-light autofocus--that's a must.
> >>
> >> 2) But, here's what I'd like to see: a stripped down camera.
> >> K-5 high ISO quality , frames per second, bracketing feature, natural
> >> shooting mode only, & AV, TV et al. modes, white balance features--then
> >> add
> >> improved lowlight autofocus.
> >>
> >> Get rid of everything else--video, creative filters, multiple exposure
> >> shooting, etc. I think a stripped down camera would make a nice back-up
> >> camera or primary camera for that matter. It would have the quality of 
> >> the
> >> K5 but hopefully at a lower cost. One could use the fancy features on the
> >> K5 if needed.
> >>
> >> Probably sounds crazy, but I thought I'd throw my 2 cents in. :-) Cheers,
> >> Christine
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Bray" <[email protected]>
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:50 AM
> >> Subject: What next in an SLR?
> >>
> >>
> >>> I'm awfully happy with the K-5. (I was out last night trying to take
> >>> flash-free pictures in the light of the full moon using my old Sigma
> >>> 30mm f1.4; it didn't come off for one reason or another, but I haven't
> >>> given up). Anyhow, it can shoot in as little light as I'll ever need,
> >>> and as many frames-per-second as I'll ever need, with as many pixels
> >>> as I'll ever need, and has a battery as big as I'll ever need, and so
> >>> on and so on.
> >>>
> >>> I'm thinking if I were a Pentax product manager trying to figure out
> >>> what to put in the K-3 or K-1... I just wouldn't know where to start.
> >>>
> >>> Smaller would be nice but you can only take that so far before the
> >>> K-glass gets way out of balance with the body; the K-5 looks
> >>> deliciously butch with the short extra-fat Sigma on.
> >>>
> >>> Once again, what should Pentax be working on? -T
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >>> follow the directions.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> >> follow the directions.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steve Desjardins
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve Desjardins
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
> 
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to