If you want choice, you could buy a Sigma or Tokina, or even a Tamron! These would be cheaper still than the Nikon I guess...
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 22 February 2002 10:41 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Dear Mr Pentax : >) > > > But this comparison is a bit unfair. It's easy to pick any > lens in any > manufacturers to make a point. It's true that the Pentax FA* > 80-200/2.8 is > expensive but it's equally true that the Pentax FA* 28-70/2.8 > is cheaper > than the competition from Nikon and Canon. So the whole thing > evens out.. > > Im lossing my patience here after the 15 email in reference to this > > Forget comparisons ok its choice One Manufacture offers a > cheaper version and an > expensive version in english terms and Pentax offers the > expensive version. > > Im talking about money terms here and I understand one would > have better qaulity than > the other but its choice > > JOe > > P�l > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
