On Apr 20, 2011, at 10:34 PM, Darren Addy wrote: > There are several of the guy's imagery that look HDR to me. Not the > overblown kind of HDR that passes for "HDR" these days, but HDR as it > is supposed to be done. > > I'm not looking at the page right now, but the Golden Gate bridge > photo is the most obvious HDR to me. The chain in the foreground is > clearly lit by a strobe. > > I think it is more than a little bit deceptive for him not to explain > some of that.
A photograph should speak for itself. While we sometimes offer explanations here, that's for discussion and enlightenment. It's certainly not a mandate and, IMO, it's inappropriate in some venues. BTW, I think it's much more likely that he employed gradient filters than HDR. But either is fine with me. Again, no explanation required. The artist's tools are his own. Paul > Makes one think the 645D is capable of doing what he > shows right out of the camera. It is more a testament to his > post-processing skills than 40 megapixels (at least as far as web > resolution images is concerned). > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
