On 5/9/2011 16:56, Mark Roberts wrote:
Igor Roshchin wrote:
http://goo.gl/5LmLv
Very creepy.
Also, they're probably violating copyright unless their licensing for
that photo included the creation of derivative works (very unlikely).
Creepy indeed. And wrong.
There is a post in The Online Photographer on the matter:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/05/hillary-clinton.html
And frankly, I am frightened by some of the comments under this post. I
produced a reply therein that hasn't been moderated yet, so you don't
see it. So to re-iterate it here - I think that what the newspaper did
is wrong on more than one (or even two) levels, including whatever
limited understanding of Judaism that I have. However, the tone and the
wording of the comments is such that it clearly shows (to me, at least)
that "judge a person by their actions and not by what they are"
principle is, how to put it, still remains rather theoretical one.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
