On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:50 AM, David J Brooks <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is really good. I googled the names you put in your last post and
> looked at the scripts. I did not understand the script thing at all. I
> need more time to look into it and try to understand it. Slow learner
> here.
>
> I did send her my version in PSCS using de speckle and curves with
> some bluring of the uter edges to try and soften the lines left after
> despeckle. Seems she is happy with that, HOWEVER

Ar hit send to quick.

However i will forward your version to her as well.

Thanks for the help folks, this has been an interesting 2 days.

BTW the scan is taken of a picture of a picture, and the lines are in
the second photo, not from scanning.

I have marked this posting for future references.

Dave
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 11-05-25 4:20 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11-05-25 11:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A good friend of mine has a scan of an old family photo in pretty
>>>> rough shape and asked me last night if i could help fix it. I just got
>>>> the scan a few moments ago:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/picture0001.jpg
>>>>
>>>> and had a quick look. I'm not even sure i know how to go about
>>>> touching this up. I told he i would look and at least try.
>>>>
>>>> Any comments or help.
>>>>
>>>> She tried to send a large Tiff file but on dial up the 24mb photo
>>>> would not load so she just sent me a 2.5 MB jpg.
>>>>
>>>> Any help is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>
>>> As others have pointed out, your biggest challenges are (1) removing the
>>> paper texture, and (2) decreasing the softness.  But it turns out that #1
>>> isn't as bad as generally thought, and #2 can be addressed too.
>>>
>>> The solution to the first problem lies with the FFT, or Fast Fourier
>>> Transform. You convert your image into the frequency domain, look for
>>> symmetrical mid and high frequency components that shouldn't be there, mask
>>> them out and reconvert back to image space.
>>>
>>> You can uncross your eyes now. :)
>>>
>>> To prove that that works, here's your image after some processing I just
>>> tried ...
>>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2254722/picture0001-filtered2.jpg
>>>
>>> I used ImageMagick and "Fred's Scripts" (fftfilter, spectrum) to create
>>> the image spectrum and process the image, and Photoshop to create the
>>> filtering mask.
>>>
>>> You can deal with #2 by using Photoshop's Smart Sharpen filter set to do
>>> "local contrast enhancement" style sharpening. Basically you crank the
>>> Radius upwards to the range 16-32 and set the Amount down between 12% to
>>> 25%.  I tried two passes with that and got reasonable results (not shown in
>>> the image above).
>>>
>>> Of course you also need to patch up the little places where the emulsion
>>> has flaked away, but the PS clone brushes can easily handle that.
>>>
>>> HTH.
>>>
>>> -bmw
>>
>> OK, I took the FFT processed result and did some spot-cloning, noise
>> reduction (Noiseware Pro), two passes of Smart Sharpening and finally levels
>> to improve black level and contrast/brightness ...
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2254722/picture0001-filtered2a.jpg
>>
>> Printed at a modest size on metallic paper, this would probably look pretty
>> good.
>>
>> -bmw
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
> www.caughtinmotion.com
> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
> York Region, Ontario, Canada
>



-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to