One technique that allows me to process hundreds of raw images per shoot and still have time to breathe is [now brace yourselves, and those with tender sensitivities avert your eyes] an initial pass through in which I delete at least three quarters. That's right, I drop the raw "digital negatives" in the bit bucket. I only keep things that are potentially publishable or have family-sentimental or documentary value. The time and space savings are amazing. -T
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: > On May 30, 2011, at 17:51, Brian Walters wrote: >> >> In summary - if you shoot RAW exclusively (or mainly), how do you manage >> the workflow and still have a life?? >> > > If you use something like Adobe's Lightroom, the only things that remind you > that you're using RAW files is that your harddrive and memory cards fill up > faster, and you have a hell of a lot more latitude for playing with exposures > and white balance after the fact. The whole concept of "batch processing" or > "converting" doesn't even exist - you just import your files, edit them, and > send your edited output to web or disk. Easy-peasy. > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson - [email protected] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
