> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > Stan Halpin
> > ... if I understand things correctly, if you batch process in > > Photoshop you end up with a second set of images (tiff or jpg) > whereas > > in Lightroom you just get image adjustments embedded in the DNG or as > a > > sidecar. Of course, it's entirely possible that I don't understand > > things correctly.... > > > > Brian > > > > I don't know that the technical details matter much as long as you > stick with one system, but FWIW I think your characterization of LR is > a bit off. My understanding is that image adjustments in LR are neither > embedded in the DNG nor saved as a sidecar. Rather, this is an SQL-type > system where information about an image, including any adjustments > made, is maintained in fields in the data base. If you export a file > for additional processing in Photoshop or other program, then a sidecar > may need to be built to carry along the relevant image info, but it is > not needed nor used within a LR-based workflow. What you see on the > screen at any time is an on-the-fly JPEG rendition of your image as > modified by everything you have done to that image within LR. The image > is off wherever you put it, and all of the information about that image > is within the LR database system. > A thousand words: <http://www.web-options.com/Lichtkammer.htm> B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
