On 25 Feb 2002 at 8:11, Aaron Reynolds wrote: > Tom, here's the easy solution: > > If you like Portra 160NC, try a roll of Fuji NPS. If you're a VC > person, try NPC.
Thanks, that's what I was looking for. What are the 400 versions? I wonder how many customers Fuji loses because people just can't figure out their freaking naming conventions? > Shoot the same subject under the same lighting with > the same exposure and give the lab the two rolls, then without looking > at the negs, pick the print you like best. I think that's where my dilemma comes in. If I do the test right, I'll also test a lab that uses Kodak paper, and I bet I like that result better. I may have to suck it up and switch labs. > > This, combined with most people thinking that it is slower than it > says on the box, leads me to think that the film is maybe not quite up > to C-41 spec. Sounds like something microsoft would do. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
