On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:40 AM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote:
> I understand what you're saying, but I just don't see the "in-yer-face > intrusive" nature of the advertising at photo.net. > > I am not a member of photo.net, so if it's bad I should be getting the brunt > of it. Right? > > I don't see the ads, but I can see the frames where the ads are located, and > there's less advertising on the page than in the average newspaper or > magazine. There's a banner at the top, and a banner at the bottom, and on > some pages there's a box off to one side more or less in the middle. There's almost certainly a random component to the advertising. You can't conclude that pop-over ads don't exist just because you haven't seen one (yet). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
