The SMC Pentax 135mm f2.5 is a bit more convenient, and has slightly better coatings. Though the Takumar has a really nice dedicated lens hood, that I use on the Pentax.
Darren Addy wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
A 135/1.8 would make me very happy for doing band photography.  If it also did 
macro....  Considering the state of my finances, I'm very glad that such a 
beast doesn't currently exist.

If you haven't already done so, I highly recommend you try the S-M-C
Takumar 135mm f2.5. NICE lens.
(Yes, I know that f/2.5 ≠ f/1.8)

Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to