More on the subject: "Turning away from Burning Man": http://duncandavidson.com/blog/2011/09/burningman
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bob W <[email protected]> wrote: >> > FYI! Saw this on Twitter just now. Cheers, Christine >> > >> > http://pdnpulse.com/2011/09/good-riddance-to-burning-man.html >> >> I've seen those rumors before, and that is far beyond what it has >> always been. >> >> http://blog.burningman.com/2011/01/digital-rights/updated-terms-and- >> conditions-for-2011/ >> >> This may be the phrase that they're responding to: >> Burning Man forbids the making of private profit from the documentation >> of nudity at the event when images are presented in a sexual context, >> and/or without the express written permission of subjects. >> > > > there's been some discussion about this before. That sort of clause is > almost certainly impossible to enforce in law. > > B > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
