Burning Man treats photographers like pariahs. Who needs that?
If you're doing something IN PUBLIC in the middle of the desert, and you
have to fear you doing it will show up in someone's photos, you
shouldn't be doing it in public.
From: "Bob W"
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Tim Bray
More on the subject: "Turning away from Burning Man":
http://duncandavidson.com/blog/2011/09/burningman
I wish he hadn't written this, it undercuts the rest of the piece:
"I wouldn?t concern myself with trying to be creative while respecting
anybody else?s rights or demands".
It implies that even without the conditions imposed by the organisers, that
the other people have some sort of rights and legitimate demands in this
matter and that photographers in some way breach them, neither of which is
true.
B
FYI! ?Saw this on Twitter just now. ?Cheers, Christine
http://pdnpulse.com/2011/09/good-riddance-to-burning-man.html
I've seen those rumors before, and that is far beyond what it has
always been.
http://blog.burningman.com/2011/01/digital-rights/updated-terms-and-
conditions-for-2011/
This may be the phrase that they're responding to:
Burning Man forbids the making of private profit from the
documentation
of nudity at the event when images are presented in a sexual
context,
and/or without the express written permission of subjects.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
