On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:57 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote (in part): > Unfortunately Godfrey your opinion is often the subject. You expand your > desires to cover the whole world and contract the desires of others to cover > only themselves making your opinion the only correct one.
My response: That's a rather silly opinion which I disagree with completely. You're entitled to hold whatever opinion you want, but that doesn't make it correct. I can state whatever opinion I want, but you don't have to agree with it. You see ... I can respond to your absurd opinion and not turn the whole conversation into a discussion about PJ Alling and his ridiculous opinion. I really don't care what you agree or disagree with. I'll continue to state my opinions when I care to. Respond or not, it doesn't bother me. You might consider taking that approach when you disagree with my "histrionics" in the future. BTW, I've never read Walt Gilbert's comments in the past, he's not participated in any useful way in this discussion between me and Anthony Farr, so he pipes in simply to make insinuating remarks. I find that rather obnoxious, frankly. I don't care to read Walt Gilbert's comments any further so I've put him on my delete list. He should do the same with me since I seem to upset him so. On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:57 PM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/12/2011 8:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:22 PM, P. J. Alling >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Often Godfrey seems to believe that the world revolves around him. I >>> guess >>> we're all guilty of that, but Godfrey often seems to be less self aware, >>> especially when feelings begin to run high. >> >> What always perplexes me is why you and so many others prefer to talk >> about me rather than the subject I'm trying to have a discussion with >> someone about. >> > Unfortunately Godfrey your opinion is often the subject. You expand your > desires to cover the whole world and contract the desires of others to cover > only themselves making your opinion the only correct one. We are all > guilty of it, you however seem to be completely unaware when you do it. > I've read this thread, and once again you've succeeded in making it almost > entirely about your opinions, which then makes the conversation about you. > I'm sorry but that's the way I see it. > > I've stayed out of this until now, but you know, when I was doing newspaper > work, I would have killed to get high ISO images that were relatively clean. > The higher the better. But you see you never had that need so it's > irrelevant to /everyone/. I personally have never found myself in a > situation where I needed more than 5 frames per second, but you know I > recognize that some photographers might /need/ even higher fps rates. I > seldom make prints bigger than 8x10 but you know, it would really be nice to > be able to. In your world it seems if you don't need it nobody does.. > > -- > Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid > a lengthily search. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
