On 9/13/2011 12:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You might consider taking that approach when you disagree with my
"histrionics" in the future.
BTW, I've never read Walt Gilbert's comments in the past, he's not
participated in any useful way in this discussion between me and
Anthony Farr, so he pipes in simply to make insinuating remarks. I
find that rather obnoxious, frankly. I don't care to read Walt
Gilbert's comments any further so I've put him on my delete list. He
should do the same with me since I seem to upset him so.
I never expected to make the Hall of Fame so quickly.
Today (day-ay-ay-ay) . . . I consider myself the luckiest man
(an-an-an-an) . . . on the face of the earth (erth-erth-erth-erth)!!!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:57 PM, P. J. Alling
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 9/12/2011 8:15 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:22 PM, P. J. Alling
<[email protected]> wrote:
Often Godfrey seems to believe that the world revolves around him. I
guess
we're all guilty of that, but Godfrey often seems to be less self aware,
especially when feelings begin to run high.
What always perplexes me is why you and so many others prefer to talk
about me rather than the subject I'm trying to have a discussion with
someone about.
Unfortunately Godfrey your opinion is often the subject. You expand your
desires to cover the whole world and contract the desires of others to cover
only themselves making your opinion the only correct one. We are all
guilty of it, you however seem to be completely unaware when you do it.
I've read this thread, and once again you've succeeded in making it almost
entirely about your opinions, which then makes the conversation about you.
I'm sorry but that's the way I see it.
I've stayed out of this until now, but you know, when I was doing newspaper
work, I would have killed to get high ISO images that were relatively clean.
The higher the better. But you see you never had that need so it's
irrelevant to /everyone/. I personally have never found myself in a
situation where I needed more than 5 frames per second, but you know I
recognize that some photographers might /need/ even higher fps rates. I
seldom make prints bigger than 8x10 but you know, it would really be nice to
be able to. In your world it seems if you don't need it nobody does..
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid
a lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
