Wouldn't Pentax want back compatibility with their old K mounts FF lenses? I guess they could just extend them out with an adapter. If they get a good senor and make all the basic functions work well this could be a good camera for them.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Dario Bonazza <[email protected]> wrote: > Steven Desjardins wrote: > > True. They are smaller and lighter than other FF bodies. It's > probably a good model of how small you can make a FF body. I don't > know if the RF VF is any smaller than the presumed EVF that would be > in the Pentax model. > > My reply: > > A newly-designed FF mirrorless can probably be smaller than the M9, at least > it can be a lot slimmer because Leica had to retain the register distance of > M cameras, while adding the sensor and the LCD on the back, thus making the > thing thicker than film Leicas. > > Dario > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
