I'm betting they won't do it at all. There's no natural progression of buyers for such a camera. On the other hand, they've sold a lot of APS-C cameras and DA* lenses, so they have a built-in market for another camera in that line. It's a no brainer in marketing terms. Paul
On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:50 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > An EVF would be critical on a higher end system like this. I don't > think it has to be thinner but it does have to be smaller and lighter. > Given the size of lenses for an FF sensor it will never be pocketable > in an sense, but could easily be smaller than one of the C/N FF DSLRs. > This could be a good idea if they do it well. > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Dario Bonazza > <[email protected]> wrote: >> John Sessoms wrote: >> >>> Would this be a camera with an electronic viewfinder you can put your eye >>> up to or one of those where you have to hold it out at arms length to look >>> at the little TV screen on the back? >> >> >> Who knows? I'm only afraid that Pentax is going to show silly things for the >> pure sake of making them different. They already embraced that route, and >> Ricoh is keen on that scheme too. Fingers crossed... >> >> Dario >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
