On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 AM, John Francis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote: >> IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate >> framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks >> nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided.
I have found that EVFs are extremely handy in low light. I'm quite interested in an APS "rangefinder" with low light performance at least as good as the K-5, especially one with an adapter so I can use K-mount lenses. >> Of course, we're used to all these advantages together with the SLR >> so individual reactions may vary. I don't feel the EVF limits my >> photography so the only question now for me is LCD screen versus >> eye-level. > > That very much depends on the camera. But from my experience yesterday > with the E-PL1 in bright California sunshine (checking out the 40-150 > lens that has mysteriously turned up in my wife's camera kit) I think > the add-on eye-level finder will soon end up in the bag, too. Wow! that WAF is one sneaky girl. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
