On Thu, Jan 12, 2012, at 08:35 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
> Steven Desjardins wrote:
> 
> Size comparison with K5
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmflores/6676569317/
> 
> Confirmed, the X-Pro 1 is just another way to make a K-5. 
> IMHO, an APS rangefinder-style camera should be much smaller than that.
> Otherwise, it's rather pointless.


Well, I dunno.  I'm not a fan of the fad for ever smaller cameras.  My
K200D is about right.  I've handled a K-r and it's too small.  An APS
mirrorless camera of any size has an advantage over a DSLR in being able
to accept virtually any lens (provided appropriate adapters are
available).  To me, that's the main advantage.  Size isn't an issue. 
Price is.  :-(



Cheers

Brian

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
-- 


-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to