On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:52:24AM -0800, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:47 AM, John Francis wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:41:54AM -0500, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >> IMHO, the EVF is probably the best actual route to provide accurate > >> framing and information in non-reflex cameras. The optical one looks > >> nicer, but it's not as useful a tool in terms of information provided. > > I have found that EVFs are extremely handy in low light. I'm quite > interested in an APS "rangefinder" with low light performance at least as > good as the K-5, especially one with an adapter so I can use K-mount lenses. > > >> Of course, we're used to all these advantages together with the SLR > >> so individual reactions may vary. I don't feel the EVF limits my > >> photography so the only question now for me is LCD screen versus > >> eye-level. > > > > That very much depends on the camera. But from my experience yesterday > > with the E-PL1 in bright California sunshine (checking out the 40-150 > > lens that has mysteriously turned up in my wife's camera kit) I think > > the add-on eye-level finder will soon end up in the bag, too. > > Wow! that WAF is one sneaky girl.
I didn't say who was responsible for the lens turning up there ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
