>Brian Walters wrote: >>> >> Well, I dunno. I'm not a fan of the fad for ever smaller cameras. My >> K200D is about right. I've handled a K-r and it's too small. An APS >> mirrorless camera of any size has an advantage over a DSLR in being able >> to accept virtually any lens (provided appropriate adapters are >> available). To me, that's the main advantage. Size isn't an issue. >> Price is. :-( > >Brian, don't mistake me for a Q-size fan, which I'm far from being. For a >rangefinder-style camera, I'd like a size comparable to the E-P3, or an MX, >if you prefer. In fact, I'm still waiting for an MX-D (now possible, by >using the mirrorless technology). >Assuming that one already owns a medium-size APS DSLR system, I don't see >the point of the X-Pro 1 because it does not give noticeable size/weight >advantage. Oh, and I can already use all of my lenses on a K-5 ;-) > >Dario >
I agree. I was a little excited about the X Pro 1, until I discovered that it is almost the same size as K-5. DagT -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
