These guys always insist on "capture" images. Both media always involve some PP, minimally the JPEG engine or photolab's chemical development. For absolute quality comparison you should allow both files to be optimized in LR. The problem with all of these comparisons is that they are typically being done by someone defending the honor of film and inevitably bias the test in small ways toward film's advantages. For example, I have little doubt that film has a DR advantage over digital, although he made a point of using print and not slide film. At least he didn't use Tri-X. ;-)
The real advantage of digital for me is that i can take so many pictures of the same scene, chanage settings, and just On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 1/16/2012 11:05 AM, Darren Addy wrote: >> >> Purchased my first Rolleicord this morning, a model V (mainly because >> I thought it was too cheap). >> Whilst Googling around I came across this interesting video: >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8lWLEtC8wY >> Some of the comments are a fun read, also. > > > That's the second film vs digital comparison I've run across in the past > couple of days: > http://www.twinlenslife.com/2009/05/digital-vs-film-real-deal-nikon-d300-vs.html > > Which points to this one from last year. > http://www.twinlenslife.com/2011/01/digital-vs-film-canon-5d-mark-ii-vs.html > > > The funny thing is that for me, I've been getting far better image quality > with my DSLRs than I have ever gotten with film. > > >> >> Darren Addy >> Kearney, Nebraska >> > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] (from dos4est) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
