It's also fairly heavy at 19.5 oz. On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Mark C <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/19/2012 1:44 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >> >> Wasn't this sort of idea soundly debunked here because the body would >> have to be too thick to be "worthwhile"? Flange distance? >> >> Will the bumblebee fly after all? > > That website puts the K-01's dimensions at 59 mm deep. That's 14mm less than > a K-5. The Sony Nex - 7 is 43mm. The ME Super was 49.5 mm. > > For me, all of the mirrorless systems are still too big for the times when I > need a small camera to slip into my pocket. And when I don't need a small > camera, I don't mind carrying a SLR. > > Mark C. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions.
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
