It's only sill because Pentax users, who live in their own little universe and are clueless when it comes to using other systems, think that a ZX-5n or ZX-M and AF lens availabilty is just as good as Canon and Nkon for wild life. Having used more than one system I would say that Pentax is fine for stuffed animals, but for live ones there are far more sutiable tools. I know, it's all marketing. All magazines are paid off. All professional photographers using Canon or Nikon have either been given their equipment for free, or mindless fools sucked in by the ads. As soon as Pentax comes out with that world class, full frame sensor DSLR, they'll all see the errors in their way and Pentax will be back on top. Pentax has aquired its present reputation through years of dilligent presistance of making 35mm SLRs that serious amatures and professionals don't want.
--- Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Here: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0021wu > > Yes, P�l, quite silly. The same attitudes/platitudes (generally > rehashed from the frontrunners' literature) show up in the rec.photo > newsgroups, too. > > The main problem, though, is that Pentax has done little to > counteract those old chestnuts. Wherever its confused design > direction has failed to make it look bad, its inept marketing has > stepped in to fill the breach. A real shame. > > However, I think that you (and also Brian) did provide good > rebuttals. > > The record will also show that at least one PDML member weighed in > for "the opposition" - not that I'm saying that there is anything > wrong with hyphenated loyalties or anything, mind you... Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
