It reaffirms that Pentax MF gear is used by professionals. There was never any issue there. The citation also points up that most hobbiests are interested in nature photography, but this is only a very small part of professional photography. It has nothing to do with recommending equipment to the person on photo.net. I don't think current offerings are the best she could do for what she wanted to do and could afford to spend. If you'd like to sell her a 645n for under $500 (her spending limit for the body), she'd be more than happy to try it.
--- P�l Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a book by the nature photographer association here in Norway > presenting the members best images. The members are all professional nature > photographers making their living of photography. Around 50% of the images > are made with Nikon equipment, but interestingly enough, about twice as > many images were shot with Pentax equipment than with Canon equipment. I > don't know if it proves anything except that Pentax is just fine... Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
