I purchased my 6x7 for 202.11. And it's in great shape. I found a 300/4 for a reasonable price. When I get my 2X converter, I'm going to use it for nature photography. All for about the price of a Nikon N80 and a long lens. Paul
Bruce Rubenstein wrote: > It reaffirms that Pentax MF gear is used by professionals. There was never any > issue there. The citation also points up that most hobbiests are interested in > nature photography, but this is only a very small part of professional > photography. > It has nothing to do with recommending equipment to the person on photo.net. I > don't think current offerings are the best she could do for what she wanted to > do and could afford to spend. If you'd like to sell her a 645n for under $500 > (her spending limit for the body), she'd be more than happy to try it. > > --- P�l Audun Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have a book by the nature photographer association here in Norway > > presenting the members best images. The members are all professional nature > > photographers making their living of photography. Around 50% of the images > > are made with Nikon equipment, but interestingly enough, about twice as > > many images were shot with Pentax equipment than with Canon equipment. I > > don't know if it proves anything except that Pentax is just fine... > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/ > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
