I would miss having image stabilization. In the lens is okay, but it adds cost 
over and over again, if you purchase multiple lenses. And since I frequently 
shoot with longer lenses in low light, I'm a big fan of IBIS.

Paul
On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:

> I'll have to think about that Miserere.
> IBIS had a big impact on my photography,
> especially shooting indoor candids.
> Regards,  Bob S.
> 
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Miserere <miser...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21 April 2012 11:28, Bob Sullivan <rf.sulli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Image Stabilization.......NO!!! - forget about it.  Regards,  Bob S.
>> 
>> IS is in some of the lenses. Bob, I like IBIS as much as the next
>> Pentaxian, but let me tell you my practical experience. I'm able to
>> regularly shoot the 30mm handheld at 1/15s and get sharp shots; the
>> small size, low weight, light shutter and lack of flapping mirror all
>> contribute to making it a much more stable shooting camera than a
>> DSLR. That said, I usually shoot at speeds faster than 1/100s, where
>> IS wouldn't help me anyway. I think Samsung's reasoning was: "Shooting
>> a 30mm f/2 wide open should give them fast enough shutter speeds that
>> they won't need IS. If they use a slow-ass zoom kit lens, then we'll
>> put the IS in the lens to help them out." I'm currently testing the
>> 16mm f/2.4 and its also highly usable wide open, making f/2.4 at 1/8s
>> shots possible.
>> 
>> I'm not defending leaving out IBIS, I'm just saying that its absence
>> has been much less of a hinderance in real-world usage than I thought
>> it would be before I started using the camera. In fact, until you
>> mentioned it here, I hadn't even considered its lack as an issue when
>> reviewing the NX20 specs.
>> 
>> My 2 cents.
>> 
>> 
>>   —M.
>> 
>>    \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com
>> 
>>    http://EnticingTheLight.com
>>    A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to