Thanks, Joe.
I mostly just neededa little reassurance that the K100D was as good a
camera as I remembered it being, since the K-x will be out of commission
for a while.
I can't complain.
-- Walt
On 4/25/2012 9:33 PM, jn289 wrote:
Walt, they are both very nice..Joe
Hi all,
Cilche as hell, I know, but I just wanted to post these two shots for
comparison purposes.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/7114470527/
K100D, F 35-135/3.5-5.3, ISO 200, 1/250, f/6.3
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6968391742/
K20D, A 50/1.7, ISO 160, 1/800, f/2.8
I'd say the the K100D w/ F 35-135 combo holds its own, considering it
was zoomed all the way out to its extreme end.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
